Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/memcg: apply add/del_page to lruvec

From: Michal Hocko
Date: Tue May 15 2012 - 08:34:33 EST

On Mon 14-05-12 18:39:16, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 13-05-12 22:02:28, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > Take lruvec further: pass it instead of zone to add_page_to_lru_list()
> > and del_page_from_lru_list(); and pagevec_lru_move_fn() pass lruvec
> > down to its target functions.
> >
> > This cleanup eliminates a swathe of cruft in memcontrol.c,
> > including mem_cgroup_lru_add_list(), mem_cgroup_lru_del_list() and
> > mem_cgroup_lru_move_lists() - which never actually touched the lists.
> Yes add_page_to_lru_list vs. mem_cgroup_lru_add_list and del variant
> were really confusing.
> > In their place, mem_cgroup_page_lruvec() to decide the lruvec,
> > previously a side-effect of add, and mem_cgroup_update_lru_size()
> > to maintain the lru_size stats.
> >
> > Whilst these are simplifications in their own right, the goal is to
> > bring the evaluation of lruvec next to the spin_locking of the lrus,
> > in preparation for a future patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> I like the patch but if Konstantin has a split up version of the same
> thing I would rather see that version first.

OK, I got confused and thought that Konstantin already posted his
versions of the same thing and wanted to have a look at it. This doesn't
seem to be the case and this changes are good enough for 3.5.

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>

Thanks and sorry for the confusion
Michal Hocko
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at