Re: [PATCH] MTD: LPC32xx SLC NAND driver

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 15:20 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> >> while ((readl(...))&&  timeout-->  0)
> >>     cpu_relax();
> 
> As I understand loops_per_jiffy, this loop will take much longer than
> the 100 ms you defined above?

Not sure about much, but longer. The idea is that this is about the
error path so if we report -EIO with a slight delay - no problem.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part