Re: 3.4.0-rc7 regression: bluetooth vs. s2ram
From: Oliver Neukum
Date: Tue May 15 2012 - 09:32:45 EST
Am Dienstag, 15. Mai 2012, 15:14:57 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> If I suspend without bnep0 active, resume works.
> (This has worked before, but "before" may mean 3.2 in this case).
> Can someone test/reproduce this? Ideas?
> PS: Under normal suspend/resume, I see these warnings in the
> log. Maybe relevant?
Most likely. Something has introduced a bug that crashes if the controller
over which a bnep is run is getting away. Does it survive a surprise removal
of the BT device while bnep is up?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/