Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] memcg: fix error code inhugetlb_force_memcg_empty()

[Tejun Heo]

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:10:34AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> (2012/05/15 3:32), Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:15:56AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 06:45:18PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> >>> -		if (cgroup_task_count(cgroup) || !list_empty(&cgroup->children))
> >>> +		if (cgroup_task_count(cgroup)
> >>> +			|| !list_empty(&cgroup->children)) {
> >>> +			ret = -EBUSY;
> >>>  			goto out;
> >>
> >> Why break the line?  It doesn't go over 80 col.
> > 
> > Ooh, it does.  Sorry, my bad.  But still, isn't it more usual to leave
> > the operator in the preceding line and align the start of the second
> > line with the first?  ie.
> > 
> > 		if (cgroup_task_count(cgroup) ||
> > 		    !list_empty(&cgroup->children)) {
> > 
> 
> 
> How about this ?
> ==
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:19:19 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] memcg: fix error code in hugetlb_force_memcg_empty()
> 
> Changelog:
>  - clean up.
> Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Heh, it was a nitpick anyway.  Please feel free to add my reviewed-by
for the whole series.

Thank you!

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/