Re: [RFC net-next 0/2] net: Use net_<level>_ratelimit

From: Johannes Berg
Date: Tue May 15 2012 - 14:27:14 EST

On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 10:59 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:

> OK, but fyi, there's a possible issue with !CONFIG_DEBUG
> builds because these patches converted some uses of
> if (net_ratelimit())
> printk(KERN_DEBUG ...
> to
> net_dbg_ratelimited()
> These messages are no longer emitted when DEBUG isn't defined
> and not using dynamic_debug. I'm not sure that's a real
> problem, but it's a difference.
> I could produce a net_printk_ratelimited that would keep
> the original behavior if necessary.
> net_printk_ratelimited(KERN_DEBUG etc...)

Btw, what would the difference be to just plain printk_ratelimited()?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at