Re: [RFC net-next 0/2] net: Use net_<level>_ratelimit
From: Johannes Berg
Date: Tue May 15 2012 - 14:27:14 EST
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 10:59 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> OK, but fyi, there's a possible issue with !CONFIG_DEBUG
> builds because these patches converted some uses of
> if (net_ratelimit())
> printk(KERN_DEBUG ...
> These messages are no longer emitted when DEBUG isn't defined
> and not using dynamic_debug. I'm not sure that's a real
> problem, but it's a difference.
> I could produce a net_printk_ratelimited that would keep
> the original behavior if necessary.
> net_printk_ratelimited(KERN_DEBUG etc...)
Btw, what would the difference be to just plain printk_ratelimited()?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/