Re: 3.4.0-rc7 regression: bluetooth vs. s2ram

[Oliver Neukum]

Am Dienstag, 15. Mai 2012, 20:01:06 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> On Tue 2012-05-15 15:29:01, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 15. Mai 2012, 15:14:57 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> > > If I suspend without bnep0 active, resume works. 
> > > 
> > > (This has worked before, but "before" may mean 3.2 in this case).
> > > 
> > > Can someone test/reproduce this? Ideas?
> > > 
> > > PS: Under normal suspend/resume, I see these warnings in the
> > > log. Maybe relevant?
> > 
> > Most likely. Something has introduced a bug that crashes if the controller
> > over which a bnep is run is getting away. Does it survive a surprise removal
> > of the BT device while bnep is up?
> 
> No, it does not. If I turn off hardware radio kill switch, machine
> dies in the same way. So not just sleep related...

You lose power, btusb cannot deal with that and you get an unplug/replug cycle.
Can you get an oops when you are hitting the kill switch?

	Regards
		Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/