Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] ARM: imx: clean and consolidate imx5 suspend andidle code

[Sascha Hauer]

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 09:34:26AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > Overall this looks ok now, some comments inline.
> >
> >> +             return ret;
> >> +
> >> +     if (cpu_is_mx51())
> >> +             suspend_set_ops(&mx5_suspend_ops);
> >
> > Now this is called only in i.MX51 context, so you can skip the cpu_is
> >
> 
> After this patch series this is also called in i.MX53 context.  I'm
> not confident about the i.MX53 suspend/resume and would prefer to
> perform further testing and address issues with it in a separate patch
> series.

In this case there is also the possibility that you add a imx51_pm_init
in which you set the suspend_ops and call imx5_pm_init afterwards. The
cpu_is_macros a kind of deprecated. Instead we settled on calling
functions with the exact SoC name from the (dt-) board files and call
the more generic function from the SoC specific ones.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/