Re: [PATCH 4/8] irqdomain: Simple NUMA awareness.

From: Paul Mundt
Date: Mon May 21 2012 - 00:46:34 EST


On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:41:35PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sat, 19 May 2012 15:11:44 +0900, Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +static inline int irq_domain_nid(struct device_node *of_node)
> > +{
> > + return of_node ? of_node_to_nid(of_node) : numa_node_id();
> > +}
> > +
>
> I think this logic should just be rolled into of_node_to_nid()
> directly instead of an irq_domain-specific helper. PowerPC and Sparc
> are the only architectures doing anything special with of_node_to_nid
> at the moment. I don't think anyone has bothered to define an
> arch-independent binding for NUMA associations.
>
> Otherwise this patch looks good to me.
>
Ok, that sounds fine to me. I've done that in the updated patch. We do
need to include linux/topology.h for the numa_node_id() definition, but
that seems to not cause too much trouble. Cross builds for sparc and
powerpc OF + NUMA platforms seem to hold up at least.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/