Re: [tip:x86/mce] x86/mce: Fix 32-bit build

[Borislav Petkov]

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 06:18:18PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 09:08 -0700, tip-bot for Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > +                                if (val & BIT_64(62)) {
> > +                                       val &= ~BIT_64(62);
> > +                                       wrmsrl(msrs[i], val);
> >                                  } 
> 
> Wouldn't it be much better to name those things, BIT(62), BIT(18) etc.
> aren't very descriptive at all.
> 
> MCE_MISC_COUNTER_PRESENT is much more descriptive than BIT(62).

I know but I have the exact bit name from the BKDG in the comment above
- CntP - and this is used only at one place - here - so no need for the
defines, IMHO.

But yeah, I see your point too.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/