Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] KVM: fast page fault

[Avi Kivity]

On 05/24/2012 09:31 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 07:37 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> 
>> On 05/23/2012 11:51 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>> Changlog:
>>> This are some changes from Marcelo's review:
>>> - drop SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT bit, now, only one bit is needed to do
>>>   lockless update.
>>>
>>> - always atomicly update spte if it can be updated out of mmu-lock.
>>>
>>> - flod the judgement of tlb flush into mmu_spte_update(), make the
>>>   code easilyer audited.
>>>
>>> Performance result:
>>> - autoest migration test (smp2.Fedora.16.64.migrate.with_autotest.dbench.unix):
>>>                                                    before     after
>>> smp2.Fedora.16.64.migrate.unix                        93      91    +2.1%
>>> smp2.Fedora.16.64.migrate.with_autotest.dbench.unix   218     188   +13.7%
>>>
>>> - the benchmark attached is used to measure the resuming time
>>>   after dirty-log
>>>                             before            after
>>> Run 10 times, Avg time:   512466818 ns.      269231261 ns   +47.5%
>> 
>> Still scary (esp. indirect sptes), but looks pretty good.
> 
> 
> Hmm, i do not have a better way to solve the ABA problem on indirect spte now. :(
> How about only allow fast page fault to work for direct spte?
> 

I'll certainly be more comfortable with that, at least to start with.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/