Re: [PATCH 1/2] Allow constructor name selection by architecture.

From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Mon May 28 2012 - 16:30:14 EST


On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 07:33:37PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> From: Vincent Sanders <vince@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The constructor symbol name is different between platforms. Allow this
> to be selected by configuration and set suitable default values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Sanders <vincent.sanders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 6 +++---
> init/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
> kernel/module.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> index 8aeadf6..fd34808 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> @@ -471,9 +471,9 @@
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS
> -#define KERNEL_CTORS() . = ALIGN(8); \
> - VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__ctors_start) = .; \
> - *(.ctors) \
> +#define KERNEL_CTORS() . = ALIGN(8); \
> + VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__ctors_start) = .; \
> + *(CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS_NAME) \
> VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__ctors_end) = .;

What is wrong with adding both "standard" names for ctors uncnditionally?
Like this:
> *(.ctors) \
> + *(.init_array) \


Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/