Re: [PATCH] cpumask: add a few comments of cpumask functions

[Alex Shi]

>>> s/return/Returns
>>>
>>> What do you mean by "old" cpumask?
>>
>> Thanks for comments!
>> Should be "the old bitmap of cpumask"?
>>
> 
> 
> No, there is no "old" or "new" cpumask here because this function doesn't
> change the cpumask. It just checks if that bit is set.
> So something like:
> Returns 1 if 'cpu' is set in 'cpumask', else returns 0.
> 



Sure, thanks! and comments changed again following your style.
Is the following new update patch ok?