Re: arm: Remaining issue with alignment of __log_buf in printk.c

[Stephen Warren]

On 05/27/2012 10:03 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 05/27/2012 06:39 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> My stargate 2 board refused to start and after bisection I ended
>> up at the same patch that Stephen found an alignment issue in.
>> Unfortunately Stephen's patch doesn't seem to have fixed the
>> issue for me.
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/10/510 is the thread.  Patch from
>> Stephen is : f8450fca6ecdea38b5a882fdf6cd097e3ec8651c
>>
>> Increasing the alignement for 32 bit systems to 8 seems to do the
>> job but I can't immediately think why...
>>
>> System is a pxa27x strong arm.
...
> #if !defined(CONFIG_64BIT) || defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
> #define LOG_ALIGN 4
> #else
> #define LOG_ALIGN 8
> #endif

Actually, why not replace that with:

#define LOG_ALIGN (__alignof__(struct log_buf))

That way, the compiler will calculate the arch-/ABI-appropriate
alignment value automatically and correctly in all cases, so we won't
have to fix that ifdef above.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/