Re: [PATCH] sched: Don't try allocating memory from offline nodes

From: David Rientjes
Date: Tue May 29 2012 - 23:21:17 EST


On Tue, 29 May 2012, Luck, Tony wrote:

> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched/core.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6449,7 +6449,7 @@ static void sched_init_numa(void)
> return;
>
> for (j = 0; j < nr_node_ids; j++) {
> - struct cpumask *mask = kzalloc_node(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL, j);
> + struct cpumask *mask = kzalloc(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!mask)
> return;
>

It's definitely better if we can allocate on the node, though, so perhaps
do the same thing that I did in
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133778739503111 by doing
kzalloc_node(..., node_online(j) ? j : NUMA_NO_NODE)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/