Re: [PATCH -v4 2/2] PCIe: Add PCIe runtime D3cold support

From: Huang Ying
Date: Wed May 30 2012 - 20:40:27 EST


On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 23:49 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 22, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, May 18, 2012, Huang Ying wrote:
> > > This patch adds runtime D3cold support to PCIe bus. D3cold is the
> > > deepest power saving state for PCIe devices. Where the main PCIe link
> > > will be powered off totally, so before the PCIe main link is powered
> > > on again, you can not access the device, even the configuration space,
> > > which is still accessible in D3hot. Because the main PCIe link is not
> > > available, the PCI PM registers can not be used to put device into/out
> > > of D3cold state, that will be done by platform logic such as ACPI
> > > _PR3.
> > >
> > > To support remote wake up in D3cold, aux power is supplied, and a
> > > side-band pin: WAKE# is used to notify remote wake up event, the pin
> > > is usually connected to platform logic such as ACPI GPE. This is
> > > quite different with other power saving states, where remote wake up
> > > is notified via PME message through the PCIe main link.
> > >
> > > PCIe devices in plug-in slot usually has no direct platform logic, for
> > > example, there is usually no ACPI _PR3 for them. The D3cold support
> > > for these devices can be done via the PCIe port connected to it. When
> > > power on/off the PCIe port, the corresponding PCIe devices are powered
> > > on/off too. And the remote wake up event from PCIe device will be
> > > notified to the corresponding PCIe port.
> > >
> > > The PCI subsystem D3cold support and corresponding ACPI platform
> > > support is implemented in the patch. Including the support for PCIe
> > > devices in plug-in slot.
> > >
> > > For more information about PCIe D3cold and corresponding ACPI support,
> > > please refer to:
> > >
> > > - PCI Express Base Specification Revision 2.0
> > > - Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification Revision 5.0
> > >
> > > Originally-by: Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
>
> On a second thought ...
>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 23 +++++++-
> > > drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 3 +
> > > drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 29 ++++++++++
> > > drivers/pci/pci.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > drivers/pci/pci.h | 1
> > > drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c | 44 ++++++++++++++--
> > > include/linux/pci.h | 16 ++++-
> > > 7 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> > > @@ -48,6 +48,12 @@ static void pci_acpi_wake_dev(acpi_handl
> > > if (event != ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE || !pci_dev)
> > > return;
> > >
> > > + if (pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D3cold) {
> > > + pci_wakeup_event(pci_dev);
> > > + pm_runtime_resume(&pci_dev->dev);
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (!pci_dev->pm_cap || !pci_dev->pme_support
> > > || pci_check_pme_status(pci_dev)) {
> > > if (pci_dev->pme_poll)
> > > @@ -187,10 +193,13 @@ acpi_status pci_acpi_remove_pm_notifier(
> > >
> > > static pci_power_t acpi_pci_choose_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > {
> > > - int acpi_state;
> > > + int acpi_state, d_max;
> > >
> > > - acpi_state = acpi_pm_device_sleep_state(&pdev->dev, NULL,
> > > - ACPI_STATE_D3);
>
> I wonder what tree this patch is against? The code above doesn't seem to
> be present in the current mainline.

As stated in [PATCH -v4 0/2], This patchset is based on:

[PATCH -v2] ACPI, PM, Specify lowest allowed state for device sleep
state

Which is sent to LKML separately.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/