RE: [PATCH v1] x86/irq: handle chained interrupts during IRQmigration

From: Iyer, Sundar
Date: Thu May 31 2012 - 03:36:23 EST


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 1:01 PM
>>
>> Handle this by introducing a irq_is_chained() check which is based on
>> the IRQ_NOREQUEST flag being set for such interrupts. fixup_irq() can
>> then handle such interrupts and not skip them over.
>
>No, we need a separate flag for those. IRQ_NORREQUEST is not a reliable indicator.

I posted a v2 for this patch with all the flags; else will it be okay me adding
a new flag called IRQ_CHAINED and a new function similar to set_noprobe* helpers?

Cheers!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/