Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Don't assume the alternative cyclesencoding is architectural

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 18:08 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> How about newer unknown Intel CPUs with arch_perfmon >= 3? Those would get 
> intel_pmu, correct?  There's no guarantee that they support the trick.

But they will have no PEBS constraints set, so effectively don't have
PEBS.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/