Re: lockdep and kmemcheck

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Fri Jun 08 2012 - 02:10:42 EST


On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 09:45:16PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> static struct worker *create_worker(struct global_cwq *gcwq, bool bind)
> {
> bool on_unbound_cpu = gcwq->cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
> struct worker *worker = NULL;
> int id = -1;
>
> spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
> while (ida_get_new(&gcwq->worker_ida, &id)) {
> spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
> if (!ida_pre_get(&gcwq->worker_ida, GFP_KERNEL))
>
> and GFP_KERNEL has __GFP_FS.
>
> > > [<ffffffff81ae441d>] init_workqueues+0x1f2/0x393
> > > [<ffffffff81ae422b>] ? usermodehelper_init+0x36/0x36
> > > [<ffffffff81ae422b>] ? usermodehelper_init+0x36/0x36
> > > [<ffffffff81002122>] do_one_initcall+0x122/0x180
> > > [<ffffffff81acbc7a>] kernel_init+0x9b/0x1f6
> > > [<ffffffff815c1f74>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> > > [<ffffffff815c0274>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
> > > [<ffffffff81acbbdf>] ? start_kernel+0x3d2/0x3d2
> > > [<ffffffff815c1f70>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
> > > ---[ end trace 6d450e935ee1897c ]---
> > > MCE: In-kernel MCE decoding enabled.
> > > NMI watchdog: enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
>
> Let's add some more people to CC.
>
> Tejun, this create_worker() uses ida_pre_get() with GFP_KERNEL mask
> but lockdep complains about __GFP_FS allocations with IRQs off in
> __lockdep_trace_alloc. What's up?

The GFP_KERNEL allocation is right after spin_unlock_irq(). I suppose
this is from early boot before IRQs are brought online, right? My
memory is very fuzzy now but ISTR irq debug code and lockdep having
workarounds for early boot. Peter?

Thanks.

--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/