Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Quiet down the boot messages

From: Don Zickus
Date: Fri Jun 08 2012 - 09:49:45 EST


On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 07:41:14PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 22:15 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > A bunch of bugzillas have complained how noisy the nmi_watchdog is during
> > boot-up especially with its expected failure cases (like virt and bios
> > resource contention).
>
> Hi Don, this seems nicer.
>
> Just some trivial comments below:

I like the feedback. I'll respin the patch and include them.

Thanks,
Don

>
> > This is my attempt to quiet them down and keep it less confusing for the end
> > user. What I did is print the message for cpu0 and save it for future
> > comparisions.
>
> comparisons
>
> []
> > After the change, it is simlified to:
>
> simplified
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
> []
> > @@ -377,6 +377,14 @@ static int watchdog_nmi_enable(int cpu)
> > struct perf_event_attr *wd_attr;
> > struct perf_event *event = per_cpu(watchdog_ev, cpu);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * People like the simple clean cpu node info
> > + * on boot. Simplify the noise from the watchdog
> > + * by only printing messages that are different than
> > + * what cpu0 displayed
> > + */
>
> This comment could be shortened by a line
> /*
> * People like simple and clean cpu node info on boot.
> * Reduce the watchdog noise by only printing messages
> * that are different from what cpu0 displayed.
> */
>
> > + static unsigned long err0 = 0;
>
> Strictly, this doesn't need initialization.
> I think the err0 name is unclear. Maybe cpu0_err instead;
>
> I think the use of !cpu and cpu is unclear.
> It's still a cpu, just index 0.
> !cpu should be cpu == 0 and
> cpu should be cpu != 0 too.
>
>
> > @@ -390,11 +398,21 @@ static int watchdog_nmi_enable(int cpu)
> >
> > /* Try to register using hardware perf events */
> > event = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(wd_attr, cpu, NULL, watchdog_overflow_callback, NULL);
> > +
> > + /* save cpu0 error for future comparision */
> > + if (!cpu)
> > + err0 = (IS_ERR(event) ? PTR_ERR(event) : 0);
>
> if (cpu == 0 && IS_ERR(event))
> cpu0_err = PTR_ERR(event);
>
> > +
> > if (!IS_ERR(event)) {
> > - pr_info("enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.\n");
> > + /* only print for cpu0 or different than cpu0 */
>
> or if
>
> > + if (!cpu || err0)
>
> if (cpu == 0 || cpu0_err)
>
> > + pr_info("enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.\n");
> > goto out_save;
> > }
> >
> > + /* skip displaying the same error again */
> > + if ((PTR_ERR(event) == err0) && cpu)
>
> if (cpu > 0 && PTR_ERR(event))
> > + return PTR_ERR(event);
> >
> > /* vary the KERN level based on the returned errno */
> > if (PTR_ERR(event) == -EOPNOTSUPP)
>
> cheers, Joe
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/