Re: [PATCH] devicetree: bindings: gpio-i2c belongs to i2c not gpio

[Rob Herring]

On 06/11/2012 07:26 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 05:08:02PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> gpio-i2c describes an I2C controller (using gpios for data and clock),
>> so it must be described in i2c, not gpio.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  .../{gpio/gpio_i2c.txt => i2c/gpio-i2c.txt}        |    0
>>  1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>  rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{gpio/gpio_i2c.txt => i2c/gpio-i2c.txt} (100%)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_i2c.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/gpio-i2c.txt
>> similarity index 100%
>> rename from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_i2c.txt
>> rename to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/gpio-i2c.txt
> 
> Any objections to me taking the patch via the i2c-tree?

That's fine.

Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/