Re: [PATCH v9] mm: compaction: handle incorrect MIGRATE_UNMOVABLEtype pageblocks

[Rik van Riel]

On 06/11/2012 09:06 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:

> My initial support for this patch was based on an artifical load but one I
> felt was plausible to trigger if CMA was being used. In a normal workload
> I thought it might be possible to hit if a large process exited freeing
> a lot of pagetable pages from MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE blocks at the same time
> but that is a little unlikely and a test case would also look very artifical.
>
> Hence, I believe that if you require a real workload to demonstrate the
> benefit of the patch that it will be very difficult to find. The primary
> decision is if CMA needs this or not. I was under the impression that it
> was a help for CMA allocation success rates but I may be mistaken.

If it helps CMA allocation rates, it should also help
allocation rates for transparent hugepages.

Conveniently, THP allocation rates are already exported
in /proc/vmstat.  Now all we need is a test load :)

--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/