Re: [PATCH] e1000: save skb counts in TX to avoid cache misses

[Roman Kagan]

On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 11:37 +0400, Roman Kagan wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 06:15 +0400, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:43:58PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Jeff Kirsher <tarbal@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:38:17 -0700
> > > 
> > > > Thanks! I have applied the patch to my queue
> > > 
> > > Why?
> > > 
> > > My impression is that this is a patch already in the tree, and it's
> > > being submitted for -stable but such minor performance hacks are
> > > absolutely not appropriate for -stable submission.
> > 
> > The patch description says it is fixing reported oopses,
> 
> Exactly.
> 
> > but the Subject: isn't all that helpful there.
> 
> Well I just preserved the original subject from the upstream commit.
> Want me to resubmit with a more alarming one?
> 
> > So which is this?  Should I accept it for a stable release or not?
> 
> IMO yes ;)

What came out of this discussion?  Should I resubmit with a different
subject, or the original one is good enough?

The patch resolves a real oops; we've seen it multiple times when
running Ubuntu-11.10 in virtual machines.  Upstream and RHEL have the
fix since long.  Ubuntu is waiting for 3.0-stable to merge it
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009545).

I'd appreciate any suggestion on how to proceed.

Thanks,
Roman.
N‹§²æìr¸›yúèšØb²X¬¶ÇvØ^–)Þ{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±‘êçzX§¶›¡Ü}©ž²ÆzÚ&j:+v‰¨¾«‘êçzZ+€Ê+zf£¢·hšˆ§~†­†Ûiÿûàz¹®w¥¢¸?™¨è­Ú&¢)ßf”ù^jÇy§m…á@A«a¶Úÿ0¶ìh®å’i