Re: [linux-pm] [RFC 1/4] cpuidle: define the enter function in thedriver structure

From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Wed Jun 13 2012 - 09:10:28 EST


On 06/13/2012 02:44 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 06/08/2012 07:33 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Hi Deepthi,
>>
>>> On 06/08/2012 09:32 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>
>>>> We have the state index passed as parameter to the 'enter' function.
>>>> Most of the drivers assign their 'enter' functions several times in
>>>> the cpuidle_state structure, as we have the index, we can delegate
>>>> to the driver to handle their own callback array.
>>>>
>>>> That will have the benefit of removing multiple lines of code in the
>>>> different drivers.
>>>>
>>>> In order to smoothly modify the driver, the 'enter' function are in
>>>> the driver structure and in the cpuidle state structure. That will
>>>> let the time to modify the different drivers one by one.
>>>> So the 'cpuidle_enter' function checks if the 'enter' callback is
>>>> assigned in the driver structure and use it, otherwise it invokes
>>>> the 'enter' assigned to the cpuidle_state.
>>>
>>>
>>> Currently, the backend driver initializes
>>> all the cpuidle states supported on the platform,
>>> and each state can have its own enter routine
>>> which can be unique This is a clean approach.
>>
>> Yes, I perfectly understood the purpose of this field but as clean it is
>> it does not make sense as it is not used in this way. If it is supposed
>> to be done in the way you are describing here, we should have the same
>> number of states and enter functions. Here it is how it is used:
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | Arch | nr states | nr enter function |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | x86 (nehalem) | 3 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | x86 (snb) | 4 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | x86 (atom) | 4 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM tegra | 1 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM omap3 | 7 | 2 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM omap4 | 3 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM ux500 | 2 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM shmobile | 1 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM davinci | 2 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM at91 | 2 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM s3c64xx | 1 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM exynos | 2 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM kirkwood | 2 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | SH | 3 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | PPC | 2 | 2 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | | | |
>> | TOTAL | 39 | 17 |
>> | | | |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> As you can see most of the enter functions are only used as one.
>> The Omap3 cpuidle driver enter function for C2 calls the enter function
>> of C1. Other arch, already use a table of callbacks or the index.
> There is a plan to remove the extra enter function as part of an
> optimization, cf. [1]. The fix is planned to reach the 3.6 mainline
> kernel via Kevin's tree [2].
>
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=133856365818099&w=2
> [2] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for_3.6/pm/performance
>
> The result is that there will be only one enter function for OMAP3.

Another argument in favor of moving this field to the driver structure.

Thanks Jean for the information.

-- Daniel


--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/