Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] DT clock bindings

[Shawn Guo]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:23:18AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Right. This is why I have reposted and copied those whom commented on my
> pull request. I think at least some of Saravana's concerns boiled down
> to not requiring using DT clock bindings and not requiring driver
> changes to move to DT bindings. Both of these are met with this series.
> A platform can still use clkdev tables for binding clocks to devices and
> does not have to use DT for clocks. Drivers generally should not require
> any changes that I'm aware of, but if there are any concrete examples
> I'd like to know.
> 
> Yes, I think this should go thru you.
> 
I still have a little doubt about how this binding will best work for
imx clock.  I'm trying to cook a RFC patch discussing.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/