Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core.c Pass voltage to notifier whensetting voltage

[Pankaj Jangra]

Hi,

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Philip Rakity
<philipspatches@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> V3
> --
>
> Fix type where data argument was not passed in
> blocking_notifier_call_chain.
>
> edits to check in comments (below)
>
> V2
> --
>
> Incorporate performance suggestions made by Mark Brown
> Use linux-next as base code rather than mmc-next
>
> The voltage being set should be passed to the call in handler
> requesting the callback.  Currently this is not done.
>
> The callin handler cannot call regulator_get_voltage() to get the

"The calling"

> information since the mutex is held by the regulator and
> deadlock occurs.
>
> Without this change the receiver of the call in cannot know what
> action to take.  This is used, for example, to set PAD voltages
> when doing SD vccq voltage changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philip Rakity <prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Since you are submitting your patch from the different email than your
Singed-off email. So you should put in first line of message
From: <your real email>.

Regards,
Pankaj Jangra
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/