Re: missing leap second patches in stable.

[Dave Jones]

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:48:34AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
 > On 06/15/2012 08:20 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > Should these be in -stable ? Looks like all the other recent changes
 > > in that area are present.  With the leap second just two weeks away,
 > > it seems like they should be.
 > >
 > > Looks like 6b43ae8a619d17c4935c3320d2ef9e92bdeed05d is in 3.4-stable,
 > > (haven't checked earlier -stable trees).
 > 
 > So the second patch has been sent out for stable review as of yesterday. 
 > So it should be on its way, but you're right that I forgot to CC stable 
 > on the first TAI offset fix.
 > 
 > I'll generate the patch and send it to Greg.  Thanks for the close 
 > review here!

fwiw, I did a test on 3.5rc2 yesterday where I forced a fake leap second at midnight.
Nothing untoward happened, unlike the previous ones :-)

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/