Re: [RFC PATCH] pch_uart: Add eg20t_port lock field, avoid recursivespinlocks

From: Darren Hart
Date: Mon Jun 18 2012 - 17:43:08 EST




On 06/05/2012 04:48 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Are there still concerns about the additional lock? I'll resend V2
>> tomorrow with the single whitespace fix if I don't hear anything back today.
>
> I understand your saying. Looks good.
> However, I am not expert of linux-uart core system.
> So, I'd like UART maintainer to give us your opinion.

Greg, Alan,

any concerns with the locking approach I've adopted in the patch?

Thanks,

--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/