Re: [PATCH] x86, microcode: Make reload interface per system

[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh]

On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 06/19/2012 11:22 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Even if we have the very early microcode facility, we *still* want the
> > runtime one based on sysfs+request_firmware in order to update microcode
> > without the need for a reboot.
> 
> I am slightly questioning the clause "based on sysfs+request_firmware"
> in the above sentence, but again, not a huge deal either way.

Well, it makes the kernel tell us what (amd/intel/whatever) firmware it
wants, and requires (after patching) a simple echo 1 >foo to activate.  It
is also harmless if activated without updated firmware in place.

/dev/cpu/microcode requires special software (or a dd with bs>=file size),
since it borks if userspace breaks a microcode into two write() syscalls,
and requires detection of the cpu vendor.  Very annoying.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/