Re: [PATCH] phys_efi_set_virtual_address_map needs va, no pa.

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Thu Jun 21 2012 - 20:36:44 EST


On 06/21/2012 09:52 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>
> I am completely lost as to what should be done. How do we know
> which identity maps need to be created? Do we just add them as we are
> scanning the e820/EFI memory maps and include the reserved, etc ranges?
> Do we look at the table handed to us by EFI at the beginning of boot and
> use that as the basis? Or do we simply wait until the kernel's memory
> initialization is complete and cover all of physical memory from zero
> up to the highest physical address?
>

Robin, we already create the 1:1 maps. Right now there is some
weirdness with some of the issues that you mention, but that is
orthogonal to this.

The 1:1 map created for the kernel is created at a specific offset,
__PAGE_OFFSET, and is propagated into every vm context created by the
kernel. There are two problems:

1. The "initial" (32 bit) or "trampoline" (64 bit) maps aren't on the
list of vm contexts created by the kernel (pgd_list), so they never get
updated after a particular point in the boot.

2. The initial/trampoline maps need these mappings not just at address
__PAGE_OFFSET, but also at address zero (identity mapping), which means
that just adding it to the pgd_list is insufficient.

Note that i386-PAE is unaffected, simply because the contents of the top
(3rd) level is always fixed.

-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/