Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] kvm: Pass kvm_irqfd to functions

[Alex Williamson]

On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 11:38 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 04:24:30PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:09:04 -0600
> > Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Prune this down to just the struct kvm_irqfd so we can avoid
> > > changing function definition for every flag or field we use.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > I'm currently trying to find a way to make irqfd workable for s390
> > which will likely include using a new field in kvm_irqfd, so I'd like
> > to have this change (and I also think it makes the code nicer to read).
> > So:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Unfortunately it looks like we are not sanitizing kvm_irqfd
> at all so we won't be able to use the padding :(
> We'll need a new ioctl instead.

I think you're jumping the gun on this decision.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/