Re: AF_BUS socket address family
From: David Miller
Date: Sun Jul 01 2012 - 17:45:46 EST
From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 15:16:59 +0100
>> The issue is that what to do when a receiver goes deaf is a policy
> Something all these protocols alredy recognize and have done for years.
> The real issue for AF_BUS versus the current slow AF_UNIX approach is
> that you really need to know *who* is blocked up.
> That's no different to UDP multicast and needing to know how errored the
And the policy on what to do about such UDP multicast errors is in
userspace, which is precisely my point.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/