Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] Potential fix for leapsecond caused futex issue(v2)

[Prarit Bhargava]

On 07/02/2012 12:12 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> On 07/01/2012 11:29 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>> TODOs:
>> * Chase down the futex/hrtimer interaction to see if this could
>> be triggered in any other way.
>> * Get Tglx's input/ack
>> * Generate a backport for pre-v3.4 kernels
> So while still waiting for feedback on the clock_was_set() change, I went ahead
> and generated backports for most of the stable kernels on kernel.org.
> 

I've tested on a well-known enterprise distro ;), as well as it's more public
variant with the latest top-of-tree kernel + this second patchset across a
fairly wide selection of systems [AMD and Intel, large and small] and don't see
any issues.

(I haven't taken tglx's comments into account yet though ... this is just an
indication that the direction of the patch seems correct)

P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/