Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: tegra: Add clk_tegra structure and helper functions

[Turquette, Mike]

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday 28 June 2012 11:58 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> We had some discussions in the past on your clock reset and external
>> line request operations which you've had to put into struct clk_tegra.
>>
>> Do you need to expose those ops to code in drivers/*?  I consider that a
>> reasonable litmus test to start considering if something should be moved
>> into the generic clk.h api.
>
>
> Yes, we need these ops in drivers. Peter has sent a patch proposing to move
> these ops to generic clk.
>
> In addition, we also need mechanism/ops to change rate and parent from
> clk_ops implementation. There was some discussion but I do not know the
> latest status.
>

Hi Prashant,

OK, that is good to know.  I haven't forgotten about this topic.  I'm
still trying to think of the best way to expose less-common operations
to drivers...

Based on Stephen's feedback in patch 0 I'll be waiting for another
version of this series before taking into clk-next.

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/