[PATCH 1/2] Documentation: fix typos in power management description

From: Oskar Schirmer
Date: Tue Jul 03 2012 - 05:27:24 EST


Just two missing characters.

Signed-off-by: Oskar Schirmer <oskar@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/power/devices.txt | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/power/devices.txt b/Documentation/power/devices.txt
index 872815c..504dfe4 100644
--- a/Documentation/power/devices.txt
+++ b/Documentation/power/devices.txt
@@ -583,9 +583,10 @@ for the given device during all power transitions, instead of the respective
subsystem-level callbacks. Specifically, if a device's pm_domain pointer is
not NULL, the ->suspend() callback from the object pointed to by it will be
executed instead of its subsystem's (e.g. bus type's) ->suspend() callback and
-anlogously for all of the remaining callbacks. In other words, power management
-domain callbacks, if defined for the given device, always take precedence over
-the callbacks provided by the device's subsystem (e.g. bus type).
+analogously for all of the remaining callbacks. In other words, power
+management domain callbacks, if defined for the given device, always take
+precedence over the callbacks provided by the device's subsystem (e.g. bus
+type).

The support for device power management domains is only relevant to platforms
needing to use the same device driver power management callbacks in many
@@ -598,7 +599,7 @@ it into account in any way.
Device Low Power (suspend) States
---------------------------------
Device low-power states aren't standard. One device might only handle
-"on" and "off, while another might support a dozen different versions of
+"on" and "off", while another might support a dozen different versions of
"on" (how many engines are active?), plus a state that gets back to "on"
faster than from a full "off".

--
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/