Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 07/03/2012 10:59 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 03, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 07/02/2012 09:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Monday, July 02, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 07/02/2012 11:09 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Lezcano
>>>>> <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> we discussed last week to put in place a tree grouping the cpuidle
>>>>>> modifications [1]. Is it possible to add the tree ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> git://git.linaro.org/people/dlezcano/cpuidle-next.git #cpuidle-next
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for doing this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since MAINTAINERS is lacking a listed maintainer for cpuidle,
>>>>> are you also going to add yourself as maintainer and list this
>>>>> tree in that file, or is this a one-time exercise?
>>>>
>>>> I will be glad to do that if Len and Rafael agree on that.
>>>
>>> Len Brown has been a cpuidle maintainer for some time now.  Moreover,
>>> he's been taking patches, but Linus refused to pull his entire tree during the
>>> last merge window (as you probably know).  I honestly don't think this is
>>> a good enough reason for replacing him as a cpuidle maintainer by force.
>>>
>>> So, you should ask Len whether or not he's willing to pass the cpuidle
>>> maintenance to someone else.
>>
>> No, no. You are misunderstanding what I am proposing. I don't want to
>> replace Len I just want to act as a "proxy". I understand a maintainer
>> can be busy and could not have enough time to take care of the subsystem
>> is maintaining during a period because he's too busy for that.
>> Trust me, I fully understand that :)
>>
>> As there are a lot of modifications of cpuidle, I am proposing to take
>> the patches when they are acked-by, to create a consolidated tree,
>> providing a better integration for cpuidle, a wider testing, preventing
>> conflicts and facilitating Len's work if he agrees to pull from this tree.
>>
>> If that makes sense to add myself to the MAINTAINER file as a
>> co-maintainer (understand: send to me also the patches, so I can take
>> care of them if Len does not respond), I am ok with that.
>>
>> It is just about helping :)
> 
> Cool. :-)
> 
> So do you have a branch in the cpuidle-next.git tree that isn't going to
> be rebased?

No. I am following Linus tree and adding the patches on top of it.

>>> I know that Len hasn't been responsive recently, but I also know that he
>>> _does_ respond to inquiries sent directly to him.
>>
>> Do you mean to its intel address ?
> 
> Yes, CCing the Len's Intel address won't hurt I think.

Ok, I will ping him and give him the pointers to the discussion we had.

Thanks
  -- Daniel

-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/