Re: RFD: virtio balloon API use (was Re: [PATCH 5 of 5] virtio:expose added descriptors immediately)
From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Date: Wed Jul 04 2012 - 06:55:30 EST
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:17:46AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 13:08:19 -0300, Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > As 'locking in balloon', may I assume the approach I took for the compaction case
> > is OK and aligned to address these concerns of yours? If not, do not hesitate in
> > giving me your thoughts, please. I'm respinning a V3 series to address a couple
> > of extra nitpicks from the compaction standpoint, and I'd love to be able to
> > address any extra concern you might have on the balloon side of that work.
> It's orthogonal, though looks like they clash textually :(
> I'll re-spin MST's patch on top of yours, and include both in my tree,
> otherwise linux-next will have to do the merge. But I'll await your
> push before pushing to Linus next merge window.
While theoretical mine is a bugfix so could be 3.5 material, no?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/