Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is no longer experimental
From: Jean Delvare
Date: Fri Jul 06 2012 - 13:57:30 EST
Le vendredi 06 juillet 2012 Ã 10:23 -0700, Randy Dunlap a Ãcrit :
> On 07/06/2012 07:08 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > This feature has been around for over 5 years now, so I presume it is
> > no longer considered experimental.
> > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Or is there any reason to still consider this an experimental feature?
> I doubt it, but if it is still experimental, it should also have
> depends on EXPERIMENTAL
> and then it would be nice if kconfig (the software) would add the
> " (EXPERIMENTAL)" tag when it sees such a dependency.
Oh yeah, I've been dreaming of this for years now but never found the
time to actually look into implementing it. Not sure if I would actually
be able to anyway, as it will probably require some Kconfig magic beyond
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/