Re: [RFC][PATCH 14/26] sched, numa: Numa balancer

[Rik van Riel]

On 03/16/2012 10:40 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

+static bool can_move_ne(struct numa_entity *ne)
+{
+	/*
+	 * XXX: consider mems_allowed, stinking cpusets has mems_allowed
+	 * per task and it can actually differ over a whole process, la-la-la.
+	 */
+	return true;
+}

This looks like something that should be fixed before the
code is submitted for merging upstream.

--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/