Re: WARNING: __GFP_FS allocations with IRQs disabled(kmemcheck_alloc_shadow)

From: David Rientjes
Date: Sun Jul 08 2012 - 19:01:40 EST


On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, JoonSoo Kim wrote:

> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 8c691fa..5d41cad 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1324,8 +1324,14 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct
> kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
> && !(s->flags & (SLAB_NOTRACK | DEBUG_DEFAULT_FLAGS))) {
> int pages = 1 << oo_order(oo);
>
> + if (flags & __GFP_WAIT)
> + local_irq_enable();
> +
> kmemcheck_alloc_shadow(page, oo_order(oo), flags, node);
>
> + if (flags & __GFP_WAIT)
> + local_irq_disable();
> +
> /*
> * Objects from caches that have a constructor don't get
> * cleared when they're allocated, so we need to do it here.

This patch is suboptimal when the branch is taken since you just disabled
irqs and now are immediately reenabling them and then disabling them
again. (And your patch is also whitespace damaged, has no changelog, and
isn't signed off so it can't be applied.)

The correct fix is what I proposed at
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133754837703630 and was awaiting
testing. If Rus, Steven, or Fengguang could test this then we could add
it as a stable backport as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/