Antw: Re: /sys and access(2): Correctly implemented?

[Ulrich Windl]

>>> Ryan Mallon <rmallon@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 09.07.2012 um 01:24 in Nachricht
<4FFA16B6.9050009@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On 06/07/12 16:27, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Recently I found a problem with the command (kernel 3.0.34-0.7-default from 
> SLES 11 SP2, run as root):
> > test -r "$file" && cat "$file"
> > emitting "Permission denied"
> > 
> > Investigating, I found that "test" actually uses "access()" to check for 
> permissions. Unfortunately there are some files in /sys that have "write-only" 
> permission bits set (e.g. /sys/devices/system/cpu/probe).
> > 
> > ~ # ll /sys/devices/system/cpu/probe
> > --w------- 1 root root 4096 Jun 29 12:43 /sys/devices/system/cpu/probe
> > ~ # F=/sys/devices/system/cpu/probe
> > ~ # test "$F" && cat "$F"
> > cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/probe: Permission denied
> 
> Looks like you have a typo here, I think you wanted "test -r $F", not
> "test $F", the latter will just evaluate "$F" as an expression which
> will be true, and so you get the permission denied error running cat.

Hi!

You are right: It's a typo, but only in the message; the actual test was done correctly, and the outcome is quite the same.

> 
> Using "test -r $F" on a write-only sysfs file correctly returns false on
> my machine (Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS/2.6.32-41-generic).

Not here, unfortunately:
# ll /sys/devices/system/cpu/probe
--w------- 1 root root 4096 Jul  2 11:52 /sys/devices/system/cpu/probe
# F=/sys/devices/system/cpu/probe
# test -r "$F" && cat "$F"
cat: /sys/devices/system/cpu/probe: Permission denied
# uname -a
Linux h07 2.6.32.59-0.3-default #1 SMP 2012-04-27 11:14:44 +0200 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Regards,
Ulrich


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/