Re: [RFC][PATCH 14/26] sched, numa: Numa balancer

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 14:26 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Assumes symmetric NUMA -- that is, each node is of equal size.
> > + */
> > +static void set_max_mem_load(unsigned long load)
> > +{
> > +     unsigned long old_load;
> > +
> > +     spin_lock(&max_mem_load.lock);
> > +     old_load = max_mem_load.load;
> > +     if (!old_load)
> > +             old_load = load;
> > +     max_mem_load.load = (old_load + load) >> 1;
> > +     spin_unlock(&max_mem_load.lock);
> > +}
> 
> The above in your patch kind of conflicts with this bit
> from patch 6/26:

Yeah,.. its pretty broken. Its also effectively disabled, but yeah.


> Looking at how the memory load code is used, I wonder
> if it would make sense to count "zone size - free - inactive
> file" pages instead? 

Something like that, although I guess we'd want a sum over all zones in
a node for that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/