Re: [PATCH 00/36] AArch64 Linux kernel port

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 02:06:29PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> There's ongoing discussion about unifying ACPI and ftd representation, 
> and once that's done this isn't a problem, but right now there's no 

Where is this discussion?

> terribly straightforward way to do this without a lot of basically 
> boilerplate code. The biggest issue is that ACPI has a very different 
> idea about event delivery and we'd need some way to abstract that.

Right, but there's lots of bolierplate code with this stuff anyway and
it's not fundamentally hard.  Last time I looked at ACPI it had a rather
different model for how all this stuff would work than DT did which
isn't terribly helpful here.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature