Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fix for leapsecond caused hrtimer/futex issue(updated)

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 18:43 -0400, John Stultz wrote:
> Over the weekend, Thomas got a chance to review the leap second fix
> in more detail and had a few additional changes he wanted to make
> to improve performance as well as style.
> 
> So this iteration includes his modifications.
> 
> Once merged, I'll be working to get the backports finished as quickly
> as I can and sent to -stable. 

I think we all dislike 1/6, but I can't come up with anything saner
either. The rest looks good.

The only thing I found (and already mentioned to Thomas) is that the
Changelog of 1/6 could be improved by mentioning why we're in hardirq
context to begin with.

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/