Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf-lock report coredump

[David Ahern]

On 7/10/12 11:14 PM, Jovi Zhang wrote:
> > Does this fix it for you:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/6/405
> Yeah, same problem.
> But the question is if there have some sample event with raw data in
> perf.data, are we still just exit(1)?
> or let perf-lock only report those sample events with raw data?

perf-lock uses 4 tracepoints. tracepoints add -R (raw data) to events. 
So, if the perf.data does not have tracepoints, there is no need for 
perf-lock info or report subcommands to proceed.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/