Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] kvm: Improving directed yield in PLE handler

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/12/2012 08:11 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>> Ah, I thouht you objected to the CONFIG var.  Maybe call it
>> cpu_relax_intercepted since that's the linuxy name for the instruction.
>>
> 
> Ok, just to be on same page. 'll have :
> 1. cpu_relax_intercepted instead of  pause_loop_exited.
> 
> 2. CONFIG_KVM_HAVE_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT which is unconditionally
> selected for x86 and s390
> 
> 3. make request mechanism to clear cpu_relax_intercepted.
> 
> ('ll do same thing for s390 also but have not seen s390 code using
> request mechanism, so not sure if it ok.. otherwise we have to clear
> unconditionally for s390 before guest enter and for x86 we have to move
> make_request back to vmx/svm).
> will post V3 with these changes.

You can leave the s390 changes to the s390 people; just make sure the
generic code is ready.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/