Re: [PATCH 0/7] PM / I2C: Convert platform I2C drivers to PM handling based on struct dev_pm_ops

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:21:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > As per
> > 
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133996733422413&w=4
> > 
> > the following patches convert some platform I2C controller drivers to the PM
> > handling based on struct dev_pm_ops:
> > 
> > [1/7] i2c-at91: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> > [2/7] i2c-bfin-twi: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> > [3/7] i2c-ocores: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> > [4/7] i2c-pnx: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> > [5/7] i2c-puv3: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> > [6/7] i2c-stu300: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> > [7/7] i2c-tegra: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> > 
> > I'd like to include them into my PM pull request for 3.6 if there are no
> > objections.
> 
> The changes are fine by me. I'd like to pull them in via I2C, though,
> since they are changing mostly drivers for which I have other patches in
> the pile and I'd like to see the conflicts myself. Is that okay? They'd
> be in linux-next tomorrow.

Cool, thanks for handling them! :-)

> Or is there a dependency I missed?

No, there shouldn't be any.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/