Re: [patch] block: fix infinite loop in __getblk_slow

From: Josh Boyer
Date: Thu Jul 12 2012 - 10:02:33 EST


Jeff Moyer <jmoyer <at> redhat.com> writes:
>
> Hi, Linus,
>
> Jens is still on vacation, and this is a pretty important patch to get
> merged. Would you mind taking a look?
>
> This commit:
>
> commit 080399aaaf3531f5b8761ec0ac30ff98891e8686
> Author: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer <at> redhat.com>
> Date: Fri May 11 16:34:10 2012 +0200
>
> block: don't mark buffers beyond end of disk as mapped
>
> exposed a bug in __getblk_slow that causes mount to hang as it loops
> infinitely waiting for a buffer that lies beyond the end of the disk to
> become uptodate. The problem was initially reported by Torsten Hilbrich
> here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/18/54, and also reported
> independently here:
> http://www.sysresccd.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=4511, and then
> Richard W.M. Jones and Marcos Mello noted a few separate bugzillas also
> associated with the same issue.
>
> The main problem is here, in __getblk_slow:
>
> for (;;) {
> struct buffer_head * bh;
> int ret;
>
> bh = __find_get_block(bdev, block, size);
> if (bh)
> return bh;
>
> ret = grow_buffers(bdev, block, size);
> if (ret < 0)
> return NULL;
> if (ret == 0)
> free_more_memory();
> }
>
> __find_get_block does not find the block, since it will not be marked as
> mapped, and so grow_buffers is called to fill in the buffers for the
> associated page. I believe the for (;;) loop is there primarily to
> retry in the case of memory pressure keeping grow_buffers from
> succeeding. However, we also continue to loop for other cases, like the
> block lying beond the end of the disk. So, the fix I came up with is to
> only loop when grow_buffers fails due to memory allocation issues
> (return value of 0).
>
> The attached patch was tested by myself, Torsten, and Rich, and was
> found to resolve the problem in call cases.
>
> Comments, as always, are appreciated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer <at> redhat.com>
> Reported-and-Tested-by: Torsten Hilbrich <torsten.hilbrich <at> secunet.com>
> Tested-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones <at> redhat.com>
> Cc: Stable <stable <at> vger.kernel.org>

For what it's worth, we've been carrying this patch in Fedora for a
couple of weeks now. It has been confirmed to fix:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835019

Feel free to include a:

Reviewed-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxx>

if you'd like.

josh

>
> --
> Stable Notes: this patch requires backport to 3.0, 3.2 and 3.3.
>
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index 838a9cf..c7062c8 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -1036,6 +1036,9 @@ grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
> static struct buffer_head *
> __getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
> {
> + int ret;
> + struct buffer_head *bh;
> +
> /* Size must be multiple of hard sectorsize */
> if (unlikely(size & (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)-1) ||
> (size < 512 || size > PAGE_SIZE))) {
> @@ -1048,20 +1051,21 @@ __getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> - for (;;) {
> - struct buffer_head * bh;
> - int ret;
> +retry:
> + bh = __find_get_block(bdev, block, size);
> + if (bh)
> + return bh;
>
> + ret = grow_buffers(bdev, block, size);
> + if (ret == 0) {
> + free_more_memory();
> + goto retry;
> + } else if (ret > 0) {
> bh = __find_get_block(bdev, block, size);
> if (bh)
> return bh;
> -
> - ret = grow_buffers(bdev, block, size);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return NULL;
> - if (ret == 0)
> - free_more_memory();
> }
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> /*
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/