Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday 12 July 2012, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> > Please check this and talk to each other ...
> 
> I also noticed the bindings today [1]. They came in via a seperate
> patch (suboptimal) which has no ack by a devicetree maintainer which I'd
> really like to see here, because the bindings look suspicious to me.
> They look like they mostly export register settings which is usually
> questionable since we might want to abstract bindings so they can be
> useful for a number of drivers.
> 
> Arnd, since you committed the patches, can you please comment? I'd
> prefer to drop this DT conversion for now, otherwise we might have to
> support this possibly rushed bindings forever? LinusW, what do you
> think?

I've dropped the ux500/dt branch for now. and will wait for a new one
to get submitted as a replacement. There were other things wrong with
the submission that Lee already knows about, so I think it's better
to do this the proper way now.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/