[ 178/187] md/raid5: Do not add data_offset before call to is_badblock

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Thu Jul 12 2012 - 18:48:55 EST


From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>

commit 6c0544e255dd6582a9899572e120fb55d9f672a4 upstream.

In chunk_aligned_read() we are adding data_offset before calling
is_badblock. But is_badblock also adds data_offset, so that is bad.

So move the addition of data_offset to after the call to
is_badblock.

This bug was introduced by commit 31c176ecdf3563140e639
md/raid5: avoid reading from known bad blocks.
which first appeared in 3.0. So that patch is suitable for any
-stable kernel from 3.0.y onwards. However it will need minor
revision for most of those (as the comment didn't appear until
recently).

Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: ignored missing comment]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -3850,7 +3850,6 @@ static int chunk_aligned_read(struct mdd
raid_bio->bi_next = (void*)rdev;
align_bi->bi_bdev = rdev->bdev;
align_bi->bi_flags &= ~(1 << BIO_SEG_VALID);
- align_bi->bi_sector += rdev->data_offset;

if (!bio_fits_rdev(align_bi) ||
is_badblock(rdev, align_bi->bi_sector, align_bi->bi_size>>9,
@@ -3861,6 +3860,9 @@ static int chunk_aligned_read(struct mdd
return 0;
}

+ /* No reshape active, so we can trust rdev->data_offset */
+ align_bi->bi_sector += rdev->data_offset;
+
spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_for_stripe,
conf->quiesce == 0,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/