Re: [PATCH 1/2] Moved core dump functionality into its own file

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:53:34 +0800
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Alex Kelly <alex.page.kelly@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Alex <eshink@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This was done in preparation for making core dump functionality optional.
> >
> > The variable "suid_dumpable" and associated functions are left in fs/exec.c
> > because they're used elsewhere, such as in ptrace.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Kelly <alex.page.kelly@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Looks good to me:

Me too, but the first patch conflicts somewhat with a few pending
changes in linux-next.  I could fix them up, but would prefer that the
result be tested.  Alex, could you please redo the patches against
linux-next or mmotm?

Also, the patch titles could be improved.  I suggest

	coredump: move core dump functionality into its own file
	coredump: make core dump functionality optional

Documentation/SubmittingPatches section 15 describes the thinking here.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/